Skip to main content

1 July 2015 Age Pension Deeming Rate Changes

This article summarises both the recent and forecast changes to the age pension, specifically the changes to deeming rates.

SUMMARY

1 July 2015 - every July the Government reviews the deeming rates, income and assets thresholds

20 March 2015 - every March and September the Government reviews the pension rates.

Our age pension calculator reflects the above changes and forecasts age pension entitlements as at 1 July 2015.

1 July 2017 - a major change in age pension structure is proposed. 

Our age pension calculator forecasts a reduction in the age pension that most pensioners can expect.

DEEMING RATE CHANGES

1 July 2015 - The deeming thresholds have changed slightly while the deeming rates have remained unchanged, with the ‘upper’ rate of 3.25% still well above cash rates - refer below,
  • for financial investments worth up to $48,600 (for singles - previously $48,000) and up to $80,600 (for couples - previously $79,600), a deeming rate of 1.75% applies.
  • for financial investments above $48,600 (singles) or above $80,600 (couples), a higher deeming rate of 3.25% applies.

1 July 2017 - The Government has announced that from 1 July 2017, the deeming thresholds will be significantly reduced. While the focus has been on the impact of lowering the assets threshold resulting in the majority of age pensioners losing entitlements these new deeming thresholds will also impact on a large sector of age pensioners. Specifically, from July 2017, the Government intends to reduce the deeming thresholds for the lower deeming rate to $30,000 (singles - from $48,600) and $50,000 (couples - from $80,600), subject to legislation.

For information on deeming please refer to the Governments web site.


Comments

  1. we've put $200,000 in our super, after the sale of our home, as we had only $380,000 in super between the 2 of us. in order to give us some more income in retirement. from 2017 that will mean that our aged pension will be roughly 200 x $3.00 x 26 = $15,600 lower (nearly halved!)
    we have put our smaller home up for sale and move back into a bigger one, by putting $200,000 back into our home, therefore qualifying for a full pension.
    what were they thinking when they designed this? politicians, who overall don't need the pension, have no idea of the impact of this.
    at the same time they designed this 'put 1 million in your super', in order to pay no tax for themselves.
    Nice one!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This so unfair I was recently widowed at 72 had not claimed pension before as hubby was still working and died unexpectedly we went without holidays etc so we could save for our retirement and travel now with what was hubbies Super and insurances came through and what was my Super now in savings I have lost half of my pension come 2017 it will be down to about $200 a fortnight

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Contacting Centrelink

Various news outlets reported on the 11/1/17 that the human services minister, Alan Tudge, said “…I know that the call wait time for Centrelink can be long, the average call wait time at present is about 12 minutes…” and “People can also go to a Centrelink office and typically they’ll be able to see a person, in person, within 10 minutes.” Now this is a significantly different to that reported by Centrelink staff and that which has been presented at Senate enquiries. The Australian National Audit Office reported that in 2013-14 13.7 million callers hung up after waiting for as much as 1 hour. From all reports the current situation is now far worse; especially since the average age pension claim processing times have gone from an average 6 weeks to 4-5 months! Now let’s test those ‘access’ times. It’s unlikely to be statistically significant, but it may give an idea of how a ‘typical’ Centerlink recipient needs to handle the situation. We are going to work with an age pensione
After the robo-debt debacle, here's how Centrelink can win back Australians' trust This article was originally published on  The Conversation . Read the  original article .                   Australia’s social security policy and service delivery system is not designed to put customer needs first.         AAP/Julian Smith         Paul Henman , The University of Queensland   The ongoing furore over Centrelink’s automated debt recovery program has highlighted a perfect storm of poor and worsening service delivery in the federal government’s premier service delivery agency.   The extent of Centrelink’s customer service delivery problems is legendary, and it has been getting worse over the last decade. There are several reasons for this, including policy changes and funding cuts. But while the situation may look dire, there are ways Centrelink can win over dissatisfied Australians. Worsening wait times and customer experiences Since its creation in 1997, Cent

Is $0.5m in super really a “small amount”?

When providing advice to a Centrelink age pensioner, a recent article in the mainstream press (7/9/16) suggested “for a relatively small amount, such as $500,000”.  Of course “relative” can mean a number of things and is dependent upon - relative to what. So let’s look at that relativity. First we look at what $500k in super means to a single age pensioner – as was the case for the press article. Let’s assume that this was the total amount of assets held by the age pensioner. The age pension would be reduced from $870 to approx. $440pf for that “relatively” small amount. In 2017 that age pension is expected to be reduced by a further $7,700 pa. A weekly loss to the age pensioners 'budget' of nearly $150 per week from the current 2016 pension. Back to judging whether that $500k is a relatively small amount. In December 2015 the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia Ltd(ASFA) published the report “Superannuation Account Balances by Ag