Skip to main content

So who loses nearly $10,000 pa under the proposed new pension rules?

The Federal Government is tightening the age pension assets test. The Government has estimated that 91,000 pensioners will completely lose their entitlement and a far greater number of age pensioners - nearly 250,000 - will receive significantly less. While a smaller number of age pensioners will receive a modest increase.

So let’s have a quick look at how much the majority of pensioners will lose. The following table is a very basic analysis of the implications. The table is for a home owning couple who have the following level of assets. For demonstration purposes we will assume they have no other assessable income or assets.

It has been proposed by the Government that the pension asset thresholds - or cut-off-points - are to be adjusted.

Age pensioners who have assets of less than $286,500 - the current ‘lower’ threshold - will have unchanged benefits as a result of this change.

Age pensioners who have assets of value up to the new threshold - $375,000 -may receive slightly more. For example, the table shows couples with assets of $350,000 will receive an additional $2,500 pa - or approx. $50 each a week more. 

Then the application of the new upper threshold ‘kicks in’. For example those with an asset level of $500,000 will receive nearly the same while those couples with assets of $800,000 will receive approx. $10,100 pa less - approx. $220 a week less.

Table - Couples who own their home:
Assets
Current Rate
Pension $pa
Proposed Rate
Pension $pa
Difference
Pension $pa
$250,000
$33,700
$33,700
$0
$350,000
$31,300
$33,700
$2,500
$450,000
$27,300
$28,400
$1,100
$500,000
$25,400
$24,800
-$500
$600,000
$21,500
$17,700
-$3,800
$800,000
$13,600
$3,500
-$10,100
$1,000,000
$5,900
$0
-$5,900







Now the above does not take into consideration other recent changes to the pension such as the application of deeming rates to allocated income streams. For example, some of the above asset levels may be associated with ‘super’. In this case the pension may be additionally impacted by additional deemed income. Further the deemed rates remain high in comparison to ‘cash rates’.

We have already seen evidence of financial planners adjusting 'asset' levels to accommodate these revised thresholds. We may even see even more luxurious 'granny flats' being built?

 A new age pension calculator that predicts your revised pension under these new rules is being developed. Go to our web site for more information
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Contacting Centrelink

Various news outlets reported on the 11/1/17 that the human services minister, Alan Tudge, said “…I know that the call wait time for Centrelink can be long, the average call wait time at present is about 12 minutes…” and “People can also go to a Centrelink office and typically they’ll be able to see a person, in person, within 10 minutes.” Now this is a significantly different to that reported by Centrelink staff and that which has been presented at Senate enquiries. The Australian National Audit Office reported that in 2013-14 13.7 million callers hung up after waiting for as much as 1 hour. From all reports the current situation is now far worse; especially since the average age pension claim processing times have gone from an average 6 weeks to 4-5 months! Now let’s test those ‘access’ times. It’s unlikely to be statistically significant, but it may give an idea of how a ‘typical’ Centerlink recipient needs to handle the situation. We are going to work with an age pensione
1 comment
Read more
After the robo-debt debacle, here's how Centrelink can win back Australians' trust This article was originally published on  The Conversation . Read the  original article .                   Australia’s social security policy and service delivery system is not designed to put customer needs first.         AAP/Julian Smith         Paul Henman , The University of Queensland   The ongoing furore over Centrelink’s automated debt recovery program has highlighted a perfect storm of poor and worsening service delivery in the federal government’s premier service delivery agency.   The extent of Centrelink’s customer service delivery problems is legendary, and it has been getting worse over the last decade. There are several reasons for this, including policy changes and funding cuts. But while the situation may look dire, there are ways Centrelink can win over dissatisfied Australians. Worsening wait times and customer experiences Since its creation in 1997, Cent
Post a Comment
Read more

The Age Pension Work Bonus Scheme and Periodic Work

Several recent queries have suggested we update our knowledge base on the Work Bonus Scheme (WBS). The WBS provides a facility whereby the first $6,500 of age pensioners 'wages' is exempt from the income test. The WBS can apply to both you and your partner thereby providing a total of $13,000 of exemptions. In a previous blog entry we discussed how a couple on the full pension was ‘earning’ more than $20,000 on top of the full pension. Each were employed on $6,500 pa and had a $250,000  bank account earning a deemed income less than the 'other' income threshold. This is because the WBS is in addition to the the income test threshold allowance of just over $7,000. So a total of more than $20,000 can be exempted from all classes of income test. Now it should be noted the WBS only applies to only certain classes of employment - refer below. What happens if the age pensioner does not earn a consistent wage - i.e. not a steady amount over the year - yet sti
3 comments
Read more