Skip to main content

Full Pension and $53,000 pa

We recently assisted a number of financial advisors on methods to achieve the full pension while still working. To explain the options we will look at the process in small steps and be a bit simplistic. In subsequent post we will expand upon the scenario. Let's say we have a couple - Jack & Jill - who run a small business, are both of age pension age and are paying themselves a small wage. We may have both Jack and Jill paying themselves $6,500 per annum - which is the limit of the Work Bonus Scheme. Hence this combined $13,000 pa is exempt from the income test. Now lets say they have other earnings of $7,000 pa - such as additional income. More typical would be if this income were as a result of deemed income. For example they may have $250,000 in bank accounts - below the assets test - which results in a deemed income of just under $7,000 pa. Again this income is below the income test threshold of approx. $7,400 pa. So they now have a combined income of $20,000 pa - wages and deemed income. The full pension for a couple is more than $33,000 pa. The combined income is more than $53,000 pa.

Comments

  1. I think you may find the $7000 deemed income is counted as income in the income test.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you will find that the Work Bonus Scheme deductions for employment are undertaken before considering other income sources - e.g. deemed income. The above numbers have been confirmed with Centrelink with the full pension entitlement payable in addition to the employment income.

      There have been some changes to the Work Bonus Scheme with respect to 'credits' for each reporting period. I may do a new blog to explain how this operates and further clarify the above.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Contacting Centrelink

Various news outlets reported on the 11/1/17 that the human services minister, Alan Tudge, said “…I know that the call wait time for Centrelink can be long, the average call wait time at present is about 12 minutes…” and “People can also go to a Centrelink office and typically they’ll be able to see a person, in person, within 10 minutes.” Now this is a significantly different to that reported by Centrelink staff and that which has been presented at Senate enquiries. The Australian National Audit Office reported that in 2013-14 13.7 million callers hung up after waiting for as much as 1 hour. From all reports the current situation is now far worse; especially since the average age pension claim processing times have gone from an average 6 weeks to 4-5 months! Now let’s test those ‘access’ times. It’s unlikely to be statistically significant, but it may give an idea of how a ‘typical’ Centerlink recipient needs to handle the situation. We are going to work with an age pensione
After the robo-debt debacle, here's how Centrelink can win back Australians' trust This article was originally published on  The Conversation . Read the  original article .                   Australia’s social security policy and service delivery system is not designed to put customer needs first.         AAP/Julian Smith         Paul Henman , The University of Queensland   The ongoing furore over Centrelink’s automated debt recovery program has highlighted a perfect storm of poor and worsening service delivery in the federal government’s premier service delivery agency.   The extent of Centrelink’s customer service delivery problems is legendary, and it has been getting worse over the last decade. There are several reasons for this, including policy changes and funding cuts. But while the situation may look dire, there are ways Centrelink can win over dissatisfied Australians. Worsening wait times and customer experiences Since its creation in 1997, Cent

Is $0.5m in super really a “small amount”?

When providing advice to a Centrelink age pensioner, a recent article in the mainstream press (7/9/16) suggested “for a relatively small amount, such as $500,000”.  Of course “relative” can mean a number of things and is dependent upon - relative to what. So let’s look at that relativity. First we look at what $500k in super means to a single age pensioner – as was the case for the press article. Let’s assume that this was the total amount of assets held by the age pensioner. The age pension would be reduced from $870 to approx. $440pf for that “relatively” small amount. In 2017 that age pension is expected to be reduced by a further $7,700 pa. A weekly loss to the age pensioners 'budget' of nearly $150 per week from the current 2016 pension. Back to judging whether that $500k is a relatively small amount. In December 2015 the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia Ltd(ASFA) published the report “Superannuation Account Balances by Ag