Skip to main content

A house in Bali and a full age pension.

“John” recently “went through” a divorce and considers that he no longer has the funds to purchase a home whilst on the age pension. John is living with his son and their family.

John and his former partner were on the full age pension and both were receiving approx. $660 pf.

This is a summary what he did following the sale of the family home.

He continues to run a small business that requires him to travel to Bali to purchase stock. He determines that the company would benefit if he “bought” a house in Bali to use when he visits. You can not own property in Bali but it will be treated as an investment property for Centrelink purposes. The property is valued at $300k.

John also has a further $200k in super.

As a single age pensioner, without assets, he would have been entitled to approx. $870pf. Now with the above assets his age pension falls to nearly the same as what he was receiving as a part of a ‘couple’ to $660pf. 

As there is no international agreement with Indonesia, John is also worried that as he no longer has the family home he may be considered a non resident. John uses the $200k in super to enable his son to renovate the house to “pay the costs associated to build a granny flat on someone else’s property or the costs to convert someone else’s property to suit your needs and establish a lifetime right to live there” https://www.humanservices.gov.au/customer/enablers/granny-flat-right-or-interest

John's age pension now rises back to the full single age pension rate – from $660 to $870pf.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

After the robo-debt debacle, here's how Centrelink can win back Australians' trust This article was originally published on  The Conversation . Read the  original article .                   Australia’s social security policy and service delivery system is not designed to put customer needs first.         AAP/Julian Smith         Paul Henman , The University of Queensland   The ongoing furore over Centrelink’s automated debt recovery program has highlighted a perfect storm of poor and worsening service delivery in the federal government’s premier service delivery agency.   The extent of Centrelink’s customer service delivery problems is legendary, and it has been getting worse over the last decade. There are several reasons for this, including policy changes and funding cuts. But while the situation may look dire, there are ways Centrelink can win over dissatisfied Australians. Worsening wait times and customer experiences Since its creation in 1997, Cent

Contacting Centrelink

Various news outlets reported on the 11/1/17 that the human services minister, Alan Tudge, said “…I know that the call wait time for Centrelink can be long, the average call wait time at present is about 12 minutes…” and “People can also go to a Centrelink office and typically they’ll be able to see a person, in person, within 10 minutes.” Now this is a significantly different to that reported by Centrelink staff and that which has been presented at Senate enquiries. The Australian National Audit Office reported that in 2013-14 13.7 million callers hung up after waiting for as much as 1 hour. From all reports the current situation is now far worse; especially since the average age pension claim processing times have gone from an average 6 weeks to 4-5 months! Now let’s test those ‘access’ times. It’s unlikely to be statistically significant, but it may give an idea of how a ‘typical’ Centerlink recipient needs to handle the situation. We are going to work with an age pensione

Rebalancing the Assets Test

By now most pensioners will have received a letter from Centrelink outlining the changes to the age pension test from 1 January 2017. We have received a significant number of queries regarding this letter. Hence, we will attempt to summarise the most common concerns. For expediency we will use one central reference ‘document’ that in turn refers to key Government data. This reference is one of a series of fact checks published by The Conversation. We will refer to this document as The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/factcheck-is-half-to-two-thirds-of-the-australian-population-receiving-a-government-benefit-41027 Proportion of pensioners affected – 90% unaffected sounds better than 300,000 Australians to lose. The Centrelink letter states that “Ninety per cent of pensioners will either not be affected by this change or will receive an increase in their pension”. The Conversation estimates that 2.4 million Australians “were receiving Age Pensions or Veterans Affair