Skip to main content

Tapering Grandfathers

The Greens have announced they have struck a deal with the Government and agreed to a reduced age pension for most.

Over 4 years the $2.5 billion dollar saving will be the biggest single measure in the 2015 budget.

Most commentary has been focused on the impact of the assets test where some pensioners are to lose more than $13,000 pa. What must also be taken into account is that many pensioners may now have an income based assessed pension. You can not asses the impact via the assets test alone. There is a cumulative impact of the changes when the pension operates both on assets and income test to determine which generates the lowest entitlement. There will be far more age pensioners impacted than has been reported.

There must be a recognition of what all too many say about the age pension. Those currently applying still remember the days when their wage had a deduction for contributions to the age pension. Many have shown us their pay slips with that deduction. 

Now all that has changed, compulsory super was introduced and many adjusted their saving’s plans. They now find they are excluded from the age pension despite making contributions  to the pension for the majority of their working lives.

What should be considered is a period of tapering of entitlements in recognition of the many years of contributions. A similar concept exists when an age pensioner moves overseas and is paid in proportion to the number of years ‘worked’ in Australia - the Average Work Life Residence or AWLR.

To outline the concept, and in rough terms, someone now 65 and applying for the pension would have approximately 45 years under the old system and 20 years under the new compulsory super system. So they should be ‘grandfathered’ with an approx. 70% of their entitlement; recognising that the majority of their life was operating under the old  tax contributions to a pension. At least better than loosing the pension entirely. 

Now under the AWLR formulae the number of years start at the age of 16. If this rule was also applied to the proposal then the proportion of pension would be approx. 45%. Again at least better then nothing.

Over time the number of age pensioners receiving this proportional rate would reduce and eventually become redundant.

Many will often cry out when changes are proposed for the superannuation system or taxation, requesting grandfathering rules. Why has there been no discussion about grandfathering these changes or at least tapering these changes?


It’s probably too late to go back to the old system. But its not too late to go back to a system like in NZ where everyone gets the age pension - nearly all funded by the saving in bureaucracy costs.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Age Pension Work Bonus Scheme and Periodic Work

Several recent queries have suggested we update our knowledge base on the Work Bonus Scheme (WBS). The WBS provides a facility whereby the first $6,500 of age pensioners 'wages' is exempt from the income test. The WBS can apply to both you and your partner thereby providing a total of $13,000 of exemptions. In a previous blog entry we discussed how a couple on the full pension was ‘earning’ more than $20,000 on top of the full pension. Each were employed on $6,500 pa and had a $250,000  bank account earning a deemed income less than the 'other' income threshold. This is because the WBS is in addition to the the income test threshold allowance of just over $7,000. So a total of more than $20,000 can be exempted from all classes of income test. Now it should be noted the WBS only applies to only certain classes of employment - refer below. What happens if the age pensioner does not earn a consistent wage - i.e. not a steady amount over the year - yet sti...
3 comments
Read more

1 July 2015 Age Pension Deeming Rate Changes

This article summarises both the recent and forecast changes to the age pension, specifically the changes to deeming rates. SUMMARY 1 July 2015 - every July the Government reviews the deeming rates, income and assets thresholds 20 March 2015 - every March and September the Government reviews the pension rates. Our age pension calculator reflects the above changes and forecasts age pension entitlements as at 1 July 2015. 1 July 2017 - a major change in age pension structure is proposed.  Our age pension calculator forecasts a reduction in the age pension that most pensioners can expect. DEEMING RATE CHANGES 1 July 2015 - The deeming thresholds have changed slightly while the deeming rates have remained unchanged, with the ‘upper’ rate of 3.25% still well above cash rates - refer below, for financial investments worth up to $48,600 (for singles - previously $48,000) and up to $80,600 (for couples - previously $79,600), a ...
2 comments
Read more

Reducing the impact of the 2017 Age Pension changes

Maybe you are one of the two-thirds of age pensioners who are going to have their entitlements reduced, or withdrawn, on Jan 1 2017? Some households will be up to $15,000 pa worse off. How can you supplement your income to minimise the impact? The 2017 amendments to the age pension are primarily targeted towards ‘asset based’ age pensioners. The lowering of the asset thresholds may result in ‘earning’ additional income not in fact impacting on revised age pension entitlements. The following is a brief summary of the issues surrounding the options being discussed by clients and ‘the web’. Of course the following is generic and is therefore primarily designed to highlight the issues. Please contact us for specific guidance. Odd Jobs ‘John’ decides to do some odd jobs for neighbours and friends. John sets himself up as self-employed and works from a shed ‘out the back’. He expects to earn around $20,000 pa. A few matters that he should be careful with: Being self-empl...
Post a Comment
Read more